Kurien criticises Tharoor's commitment

Senior Congress leader P.J. Kurien has openly criticised fellow party member Shashi Tharoor, questioning his dedication to his constituents in Thiruvananthapuram. Kurien emphasised that genuine leadership necessitates close engagement with the local populace, suggesting that Tharoor's frequent absences undermine his effectiveness as a representative.
Kurien remarked, "If the people have moved away, instead of criticising the party, Shashi Tharoor should stay and work in Thiruvananthapuram." He further questioned, "Is he even found in Thiruvananthapuram?" 
Highlighting the importance of grassroots involvement, Kurien stated, "Who doesn't know that Shashi Tharoor spends most of his time abroad? If you want to be a leader in Kerala, you have to be a leader of the people." He underscored that leadership is earned through consistent local presence and active participation in community affairs.
Kurien also addressed Tharoor's perceived sense of entitlement within the party. He noted that despite Tharoor's international experience and linguistic proficiency, the Congress party has already accorded him significant opportunities. "Tharoor is not a traditional Congressman. He joined the party after his stint with the United Nations," Kurien observed. He elaborated that Tharoor was granted a parliamentary ticket, appointed as a minister, and entrusted with key parliamentary committees, suggesting that these roles surpass what many long-standing party members receive. 
Reflecting on the party's history, Kurien drew comparisons to past leaders who prioritised service over personal ambition. "The great men and women who led the freedom struggle under the leadership of the Indian National Congress never put a price on their selfless sacrifice," he commented. This reference serves to contrast Tharoor's approach with the selflessness exhibited by earlier Congress stalwarts.
Kurien's critique extends to Tharoor's public expressions of dissatisfaction and hints at exploring political alternatives. He contended that true commitment to the party's ideals precludes such considerations. "When Tharoor says he has options, he is suggesting that he is in the Congress with no principles or ideological commitment," Kurien asserted. This statement implies that genuine allegiance to the party's values should supersede personal grievances or aspirations.
In response to Kurien's remarks, Tharoor has maintained a measured stance. While he has previously expressed concerns about his role within the party, he has not directly addressed Kurien's latest comments. Observers note that Tharoor's diplomatic approach may be an attempt to mitigate internal discord and focus on broader political objectives. Open URL